Friday, May 13, 2005

Correlation between fast food and heart attacks

A new study in Ontario found that death rates in areas with the highest concentration of quick-service restaurants were twice as high as those in places with fewer fast food outlets, local press reported Thursday.

The study found that heart attack hospitalization rates were about 11.5 times higher in the areas with high density of quick service restuarants. A high-density region was considered to have 20 or more eateries per 100,000 population.

"We've found an important link between the number of fast-food outlets in a region and the rate of heart disease and mortality in that region," said Dr. David Alter, lead author of the study by Canada's Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES).

The study also looked at differences based on socioeconomic status, but the association between fast-food density and poor health outcomes held fast, Alter said. "It was the same whether these were affluent communities or impoverished communities."

Stephen Samis, director of health policy for the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, agreed on the importance of continuing to remind Canadians to eat a healthy and balanced diet.

However, the Canadian Restaurant and Food services Association called the research flawed and misleading.

Wednesday, May 11, 2005


Max Sutherland is author of the book 'Advertising & the Mind of the Consumer’ (published in 7 languages) and is a registered psychologist. He works as an independent marketing consultant in Australia and USA and is also adjunct Professor at Bond University.

When reading newspapers and magazines we scan ads with our minds on autopilot. We look at a print ad for no more than two seconds on average so the visual (or the headline) only has that frighteningly short time to jolt us out of autopilot and motivate us to read further.
One way to jolt an audience out of autopilot is to use visuals that trigger the mind’s ‘intruder alert’. I described this in this column two years ago. ("Capturing Attention by Triggering the Mind's 'Intruder' Alert", AdNews, August 2003). When something seems not quite right in an ad, (e.g. the ad pictured here showing a dog with technicolor spots), it triggers this ‘intruder alert’ and captures attention.
Brainwave monitoring (of Event Related Potentials –ERPs ) in medicine and psychology now extends our understanding of this. Surprising stimuli such as a dog with technicolor spots trigger several types of brain waves. The most consistent one is known as the P300 - (so called because it happens around 300 milliseconds after exposure to the stimulus – a delay of about a third of a second) . This P300 wave is triggered by novelty, surprise or any departure from expectation. (Even the unexpected absence of an event will trigger it such as the omission of one click in an otherwise regular series of clicks.)
The height of that wave indicates the amount of attention that the stimulus triggers. So this P300 wave acts like a measure of cut-through. Its amplitude is proportional to the amount of attention engaged in processing the stimulus. Even when such a stimulus is totally irrelevant to what we are doing, it will trigger a P300 and jolt us into attention.
What is revealing is that the types of stimuli that trigger the P300 are not just novelty, incongruity and surprise. Any stimulus that is ‘adaptively relevant or biologically salient’ will trigger it. What does this mean? Check out these next two ads and see if you don’t feel your P300 kicking in.

Our attention system has evolved adaptively over the millennia so that important survival stimuli (even though they are not relevant to what we are immediately attending to) will break-through into attention. Threatening stimuli (such as snakes or standing on a skyscraper-ledge) will trigger a P300, as will a possible ‘intruder’ like a dog with technicolor spots, because ‘its ID is not quite right’ and our minds have no existing mental template that fits it.
When this ‘intruder alert’ goes off it compels the mind to investigate and check it out. This alert is how we are protected from lots of recognition mistakes that we would otherwise make while the mind is on autopilot. The intruder alert turns out to be related to threat because it is adaptively relevant to survival.
Emotional Amplifier.
The amount of attention triggered by the intruder alert and indicated by the size of the P300 is amplified even further when the stimulus is both novel and emotive. Check out this next ad. It triggers both surprise and emotion.
Just as you can get a visceral feeling watching somebody on a ledge at great height, or from seeing a snake, so too can you get a visceral feeling from seeing somebody with pins stuck in their throat. This ad for Vicks throat spray works on the same shock effect that punk rock and body piercing tap into. The visceral reaction acts like a high-involvement amplifier of attention.
The greater the emotion amplifying the intruder alert, the larger the P300 and the greater the amount of attention it engages. Here’s another example that works similarly. It depicts a man who on one side of his body looks like Arnold Schwarzenegger while on the other side he is thin and scrawny with a wasted physique like a very old person whose muscles have atrophied. We have never seen anything like this before so it will trigger the mind’s intruder alert because it doesn’t fit any existing template in our mind. But more than that, there is a visceral feeling about the stimulus (almost mildly repulsive) that further amplifies the P300.
Amplifying the P300 with emotion like this can generate an even more compelling stimulus. But be cautious because more emotion and more attention are not always better. Attention is important, but it is only one of the key ingredients in the overall effectiveness of an ad.
Caution 1: Withdrawal and Recall
Ads based on the ‘intruder alert’ amplified by emotion are indeed compelling stimuli. Emotion generates attention, but beyond a point, too much emotion can become a turn-off that can curtail exposure. There is evidence from recall and recognition studies to indicate that if emotion gets too high, memory for the ad may suffer. So eliciting attention is good, but over-amplifying it with too much emotion may result in a reversal of the overall effectiveness.
Caution 2: Negative Emotion Needs to be Dissipated.
Negative emotion such as that evoked in some of the ads here, makes for an even more compelling stimulus - possibly generating even higher P300s than positive emotion. But negative emotion is only appropriate for ‘problem avoidance’ advertising (that is what the last two examples are). In other words, if the emotion is negative, the ad needs to offer a product solution that dissipates the negative visceral feeling (an internet service that doesn’t do just half the job. A throat-spray for lasting relief from a prickly throat).
Caution 3: Exaggerate the Branding
The greater the emotion in an ad, the more the ad needs to err on the side of over-prominence in the branding elements. Brand registration will very likely fail despite riveted attention if this is not done. Victims of mugging often cannot remember the face of their attacker because their attention was understandably fixed on the weapon. Similarly brand recall will fail if reader attention is too riveted onto the attention-getting stimulus.
- The P300, triggered by novelty/surprise and emotion, looks to be an indicator of attention or cut-through.
- Discovered by psychological and medical researchers, the P300 has yet to been taken up into any widespread commercial use. It seems only a matter of time before we see investigation of it for advertising.
- Using emotional stimuli to amplify the P300 triggered by the intruder alert can produce quite compelling stimuli.
- But attention is not all and too much emotion can lead to ‘turn-off’.
- Amplification of the P300 by negative emotion is appropriate only for ‘problem avoidance’ advertising that offers product solutions to dissipate those negatives feelings.
- When deploying any attention-getting device, be sure to exaggerate the brand prominence.

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Best Ads on TV

There is a website, that has some great stuff.

If you go into the archives, and into November 2003 there are a few of my favourites. The Tooheys Extra Dry and Playstation Mountain.

Some more of my personal picks are Nike Tag and Kessels Kramers work on Diesel, the TBWA\France Mama ad and Saatchi and Saatchi's Tacoma ad.

These ads are like miniature movies, and are usually better to watch than a
show, especially considering how time-starved everyone is these days, and how little attention span people have. It is the future of entertainment.

There is an article in the google news talking about how ad rates are going to be determined by the quality of the creative. Basically, if you zap through an ad on a TiVo more frequently then the station will charge you more to run it.

This will bring in an increased demand for higher quality creative and entertaining ads.

Ads like the Mountain and Tag will no longer be the exceptions, but the standard in which we will judge ads by. It sounds like fun to me.

Monday, May 09, 2005

Creative Works

1967 - Do you Eat the Red Ones Last? for Nestle Canada's Smarties
1973 - Mona Lisa for Cadbury Chocolate Canada Inc.'s Caramilk
1973 - Milk Moustache for Ontario Milk Marketing Board
1975 - The Road for A&W Food Services of Canada
1980 - Atlas Ketchup for H.J. Heinz Co.
1985 - It Tastes Awful. And It Works for W.K. Buckley Ltd.'s Buckley's Mixture
1990 - Bike Story for Canadian Tire Corp.
1996 - Stuck for Fruit of the Loom underwear
2001 - The Rant for Molson Canada's